Evil Warriors

Two Bad – Double-headed evil strategist (1985)

Two Bad is one of two two-headed figures released in 1985 (along with Modulok).

My first exposure to Two Bad came on the playground in third grade. I had gone to the same elementary school during kindergarten and first grade. But in second grade, we moved away for a year to a smaller town, which turned out to be something of a He-Man vacuum. All of the kids there seemed to be into either Voltron or Thundercats. But when I returned to my old school in the third grade, I found He-Man was still going strong there. One fall day on the playground, an enterprising kid brought out his Roboto and Two Bad figures.

I never had either of these figures myself, but I was pretty impressed with both of them. Two Bad was bizarre looking, and not just because he had two heads. He had an enormous barrel chest and his arms were mounted toward the top of his shoulders rather than to the sides. His main feature of interest seemed to be his ability to punch himself in the opposing heads.

 

 

I don’t know who designed the final look for Two Bad, but Roger Sweet seems to have come up with the general concept for a two-headed warrior. You can see several incarnations of the concept in the images below. An early idea was for a character that had an evil half and a good half. While the final figure was completely evil, he did have a different color scheme and sculpt for each half of his body.

While the concept was Roger’s, I suspect at least some of the artwork was done by Ted Mayer, based on the style. According to the Power and Honor Foundation Catalog, the half good/half evil concept was rejected by Mattel marketing, who said that both halves should be evil.

Image courtesy of Jukka Issakainen, by way of the Power and Honor Foundation Catalog
Image courtesy of Jukka Issakainen, by way of the Power and Honor Foundation Catalog
Image courtesy of Jukka Issakainen, by way of Tomart’s Action Figure Digest

Some unrelated concepts by Ted Mayer have a helmet design reminiscent of Two Bad’s blue head:

Image courtesy of Jukka Issakainen

A late hard copy/prototype of the figure shows a few subtle differences from the final toy. The prototype had more prominent and finely detailed ears and horns on the head. It also had a much slimmer torso design. I’m sure that the torso on the final figure had to be enlarged to accommodate the spring punch action feature on both arms, in addition to the spring-loaded waist.

Image source: Toy Archive
Two Bad cross sell artwork, based on the final toy, but with a slightly different shade of purple. Image courtesy of Axel Giménez

The final toy has a greatly widened torso and softer sculpted details, but is otherwise close in appearance to the prototype. All of his parts are brand new, with the exception of the standard crotch piece. He is one of several figures in the 1985 wave whose only accessory was a shield:

Shortly after it was released, the figure was reissued with a greatly flattened torso. This didn’t affect the width, but it did affect the depth. This flattened version seems to be somewhat more common than the original release. The second version also has its arms at a slightly lower angle, so they don’t obscure the faces as much.

Unfortunately Two Bad tends to suffer from discoloration with age. This seems to be “sweating” out of the plastic. It can be cleaned up with a magic eraser sponge, but it eventually returns.

There are two main versions of the US card for the figure as well. The first release features “NEW!” on the front:

Note that this set of instructions says to “fit arm to body.” The plan early on may have been to package him with his arms disconnected.

The next release omits “NEW” and has a different set of instructions on the back:

Image source: He-Man.org. The instructions on this cardback include the idea that the figure can “crush” enemies. This is easier to do on the second release of the figure, because he chest doesn’t protrude out as much.

Two Bad is said to be a strategist with “twice the plotting power” due to his two heads, although that characterization was rarely followed in printed or animated stories.

Two Bad’s cardback artwork was done by Errol McCarthy, who also illustrated the character in a number of other contexts:

Image source: He-Man.org
Image source: He-Man.org

The 1987 Style Huide, which also features art by Errol McCarthy, characterized Two Bad this way:

Role: Powerful, two-headed master of evil illusion.

Power: Ability to create the illusion that he is “two” evil warriors, twice as devious as any of his comrades.

Character Profile: Though two heads are often better than once, Two Bad is a mixed blessing for the Evil Warriors. When his two heads are working together, Two Bad is nearly as clever and devious as Skeletor, and his advantage in battle is doubled. However, his two heads rarely get along. Quite often, the two heads will bicker with one another just at the wrong moment. Skeletor has little patience with Two Bad, not only because of the distracting arguments, but because Skeletor feels that the two-headed beast could one day gain too much evil brain power.

The Style Guide seems to have taken a cue from the commercial shown earlier in this article, in which Two Bad tricks his enemies into thinking he is actually two evil warriors.

In addition to the single carded figure, Two Bad was sold in a JCPenny giftset with Tri-Klops:

http://www.grayskullmuseum.com/GiftSets/BTJCP.htm

Mattel filed for a patent on Two Bad on December 24, 1984. The inventors lists were Larry Renger and Roger Sweet. The trademark for Two Bad was filed September 10, 1984.

Two Bad came packed with The Battle of Roboto minicomic, and he and Roboto were featured heavily in the story. Each of Two Bad’s heads is constantly arguing and fighting with the other:

Two Bad was characterized in much the same way in his infrequent appearances in the Filmation He-Man cartoon.

Image courtesy of Jukka Issakainen
From the episode, Capture The Comet Keeper

Two Bad doesn’t appear in any of the MOTU box art, but he does make a few appearances in posters by William George:

Image courtesy of Jukka Issakainen
Two Bad poster, from a 1988 German MOTU magazine. Image source: http://www.he-man.org

Update: In the comments below, Aidan notes that Two Bad was characterized as an inventor in the UK MOTU comics, so he wasn’t always characterized as a simpleton. Aidan also notes that the individual heads were named Blue Head and Yellow Band, which apparently originated from notes at Filmation studios.

For detailed information about the UK Masters of the Universe comics, check out Aidan’s site at this link:

https://www.motuukcomics.co.uk/

Also check out James Eatock’s old blog for a quick example of Two Bad in the UK comics:

http://bustatoons.blogspot.com/2006/08/scientific-genius.html

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Two Bad – Double-headed evil strategist (1985)

  1. the reason for the instruction change might be cause.. well, the first one is odd.. it would make sense if the figure was designed to have the arm off when in the package, probably for cost/space saving, but appears unused as it came with the arm already attached. So telling the kid to attach the arm, was a bit dumb.

    Also, they seam kinda prototype like.. the second one points out how atleast one of the arms could do a punch, how the heads twisted and how to use both arms together to ‘hug’ others.. which is a featured used as punching himself in the face in the advert (yeah, mark of a true plotter that ^_^). where as the fact that both arms are springed isn’t said about at all in the first list.. making me wonder if the ‘hug’ idea was a bit later.. but the call out on the front kinda nixes that idea.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Perhaps Super 7 will take a stab at doing the double-headed good/evil conceptual character.

    I love these features on these characters. I can’t wait until we see Spikor.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Two Bad was given a unique characterization in the UK Comics, in which he was Skeletor’s lead inventor and had his own workshop in a cave near Snake Mountain, where he was constantly coming up with new inventions to aid Skeletor. His inventions were quite amusing, they were rather ramshackle and steampunk in appearance while being highly effective all the same. Usually his inventions would eventually backfire in a comical manner. The UK Comics came the closest to using the ‘twice the plotting power’ idea in that although the heads were always bickering, when they worked together it did seem like they had genuine brain power between them. Due to this Skeletor did not fully trust Two Bad, and indeed Two Bad plotted to eventually overthrow Skeletor – between them the heads intended that when they helped him defeat He-Man, they would create a weapon that would destroy Skeletor himself so that Two Bad could rule Eternia. The heads had individual names in the UK Comics – Blue Head and Yellow Band, which apparently came from Filmation’s notes for the cartoon although they were never used in the cartoon. For me personally, the UK Comics gave the strongest portrayal of Two Bad to this day.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Great to see another vintage character/figure review, Battleram. As much as I enjoy the blog’s other content too, it is these detailed development rundowns that I love the most.

    Although not one of my least-favourite characters, Two Bad was a figure I didn’t have as a boy. I just found him a bit too clunky and awkward looking in his design, and maybe represented how the line was becoming a bit more “gimmicky” as the waves progressed; not enough incentive to save my pocket money for him.

    I’ve known from his early idea as “Half good, half bad”; I’d imagine he fell under the same strict “We need them to be either Heroic or Evil” policy that saw so much confusion and backtracking on Zodac’s status.

    I wonder if I’d have taken to the character more if he had been constructed better – the torso is very bulky and clunky (even on the second, flat-back version) and the arms make it look even more awkward. And everyone was always confused as to the “idea” of the arms – the packaging indicated they were to be used to ‘bear hug’ an opponent (which never really worked), whereas most people used them to hit the opposite arguing head in the face! I think the feature didn’t work and should have been saved for a separate figure specifically to use the bear hug feature. All crammed into Two Bad, it was just too much.

    I remember the UK comics presenting TB more as Skeletor’s inventor, maybe to capitalise of his “strategist” tag which was very little played upon anywhere else. Personally when 200x made Tri-Klops Skeletor’s inventor I didn’t like it (because I love TK at the early bounty hunter version seen in second wave mini-comics and wanted to keep him as that), though personally I always had Trap Jaw down as Skeletor’s inventor in my own MOTU world.

    When I collected the line second hand. I did find – as mentioned in the article – that the purple sections suffered quite severe bleeding in some cases. In terms of deterioration, Two Bad was generally amongst the worst of the line (along with Roboto, who’s red and silver legs have often bled so much to give them a purple tint, that some collectors assume this to be an actual variant).

    Either way, another great write-up, Battleram. Who’s next… Roboto? Moss Man? Rio Blast? …My generally least favourite character of the line, Snout Spout? 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Thanks very much! I agree, they tried to cram too much into Two Bad, and the figure suffers for it. Honestly I don’t think he needed an action feature beyond the standard spring waist. The two heads are a big enough draw on their own. The prototype version looks much better, but would look better still with the arms at the sides like all the other figures.

    Working on Spikor next. I have Roboto half done but a friend is working on a Roboto project as well, and I’m waiting so we can release simultaneously. I already did Moss Man:

    https://battleram.wordpress.com/2016/08/14/moss-man-heroic-spy-master-of-camouflage-1985/

    Snout Spout might have to wait a while – he’s my least favorite too. :p

    Like

  6. ow could I forget you already did Moss Man!! I’ve read each entry through and through again! 🙂

    I think with each passing wave, the general mindset at Mattel was that each figure must have it’s own specific “feature” (which adds to the feeling over “over-gimmicky” as the line progressed), and whilst variety and unique play features are nice, some figures just didn’t really need much beyond the standard spring-waist.

    Two Bad, on hindsight, is a classic case of this. In concept, quite a cool design, yet just too much “Add more! More!” to it which just rendered the final figure not all that great looking.

    BTW I should point out that as a character I don’t hate Two Bad (although the classic first two waves and barbarian mythos are always where my heart is at), it’s just more down the clunky design of him which has never really endeared me to him.

    I never really took to the Tuvak and Badaar origins of the character from the 200x series; to me he’s one of those quirky characters that doesn’t really need an origin! However, whilst I wasn’t overly keen on many of the 200x figure designs, Two Bad generally rated quite highly with me, as he looked FAR less clunky, and it also played up the “two different halves merged together” element far more.

    One other minor thought I’ve long had – in a couple of panels in ‘The Battle of Roboto’, Two Bad is seen arguing over a deep orange (almost red) shield. Although this may have just been thrown in at a whim to illustrate how Two Bad often argues with himself (and ends up breaking the shield!), it’s design does resemble the Castle Grayskull shield, which in turn was recycled to be packaged with Stinkor. I wonder if at some point in the prototype stage, Two Bad was considered to come with this shield, before being given his own, uniquely designed shield?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s